Developers Aren’t CISOs — and That’s Why AI Needs Agentic Security Infrastructure

Every AI startup today promises personalization.

Across a growing spectrum of AI-native tools, they are learning your preferences, your tone, even your calendar habits. They promise to know you better — to write like you, plan like you, even negotiate on your behalf.

But there’s one thing they don’t personalize — security.

True personalization shouldn’t stop at what the AI can do — it should also shape how it’s secured.

A healthcare agent needs different safeguards than a financial one. A customer in Europe must follow GDPR; one in the U.S. may not. Without an infrastructure that can apply those differences automatically, security stays static while the AI evolves dynamically.

Not just guardrails to keep the AI polite, but protection that shields everyone it touches: the user, the company, and the agent itself.

We’ve taught AI to act human — but we haven’t taught it how to protect humans.

The Hidden Shift: From Features to Autonomy

A few years ago, “AI” meant predictive text or smart search. Now we have agents that write, code, buy, schedule, and negotiate — all on their own.

That autonomy changes everything.

When software starts taking action, not just giving answers, it stops being a passive tool and starts behaving like a digital employee. And just like employees, agents need oversight, rules, and accountability.

Yet today’s AI landscape has none of that infrastructure.

The Problem: Security Is Falling on the Wrong Shoulders

Don’t get me wrong — the industry is paying attention.
Everyone’s talking about agentic security now. Frameworks, observability tools, and guardrails — all promising to make AI safer.

Every AI company is rushing to bolt on its own “security features”: authentication, access control, red-team tests. It’s the right instinct. Deep down, we all know that without real security, agentic AI can’t scale.
Without trust, no one will let an AI agent manage their bank account or run a mission-critical workflow.

But here’s the catch — these are app-level features. They only protect what that one app can see. They don’t protect the organization as a whole.

App security can make sure an agent logs in safely or filters bad prompts. But organization-wide security enforces the bigger rules — like:

• Which models agents are allowed to use.
• What data they can touch.
• Which regions they can operate in.
• How they communicate with users and systems.

So who’s holding all of that together today? Developers.

Developers are now expected to:

• Decide which LLMs are “approved.”
• Write privacy logic into every prompt and workflow.
• Handle data retention, compliance, and audit logging.

In reality, they only see the app they built — not the full web of agents, models, and data flows across the company.

They can’t spot threats moving between systems.
They can’t contain incidents or hunt for anomalies.
They aren’t trained for that — and they shouldn’t have to be.

In trying to make AI safe, we’ve accidentally attacked the developer’s identity — turning creative builders into reluctant security operators. And that’s neither fair, nor scalable.

The Wake-Up Call: Security Features ≠ Security Solutions

We’ve seen this movie before.

When SaaS exploded, every app had its own login page, audit log, and privacy policy. But that didn’t stop data leaks or shadow IT.

Enterprises still needed cloud security platforms — systems that enforced company-wide rules: which apps were approved, which data could be shared, which users had access.

That’s how entire categories like CASB and CNAPP were born. They turned scattered app-level features into unified security solutions.

Agentic AI is heading toward the same inflection point.

Every agent can have safety checks, but without a shared enforcement layer, organizations are flying blind. Security teams can write policies, but they can’t enforce them in real time. Developers can build controls, but they can’t see beyond their own app.

If you ask most developers, they’ll tell you the same thing: They’d rather focus on building products — not wrestling with compliance or policy enforcement.

We’ve handed them the wrong responsibility, under the wrong identity. It’s not just inefficient; it’s expensive. When every team reinvents security on their own, it slows innovation and multiplies risk.

In a recent post, I shared an ROI calculator that illustrates this clearly: centralized security isn’t just safer — it’s faster and cheaper. Security, when designed right, is a business accelerator, not a brake.

That’s why we need a new bridge — an infrastructure layer that unites development and security instead of forcing them to overlap. A layer that lets developers build freely, while giving CISOs the power to enforce trust at runtime.

The Solution: Agentic Security Infrastructure

The answer isn’t another SDK or library.

It’s a runtime infrastructure layer that sits between agents and the systems they interact with — just like a security mesh for AI behavior.

Here’s what that looks like:

• Runtime Policy Enforcement

Security teams define rules (“Only approved LLMs allowed,” “Block PII in prompts,” “English-only for customer chats”) — and those policies are enforced in motion, not in documentation.

• Unified Observability

A single dashboard showing which agents are active, what data they touch, and which external APIs they call. Finally, security teams can monitor AI activity the same way they monitor network traffic.

• Contextual Compliance

Policies automatically adapt to geography, regulation, or data type — GDPR in Europe, HIPAA for healthcare, PCI for payments — without rewriting code.

• Empowered Roles

Developers build the experiences.
Security teams enforce the trust.
Each does what they do best — and the system keeps both in sync.

That’s what Agentic Security Infrastructure means: turning guidance into governance, and autonomy into accountability.

What makes this infrastructure powerful isn’t just enforcement — it’s flexibility. With a policy layer in place, organizations can finally tailor security the same way AI tailors experience.

A healthcare customer can operate under HIPAA policies; a European user under GDPR; a developer test environment under relaxed rules. Different agents, different contexts — all governed through one runtime layer. That’s what personalized security looks like in practice.

The Human Angle: Restoring Roles and Trust

This isn’t just about technology — it’s about identity.

Developers want to build creative, high-impact applications. Security teams want to protect data and enforce trust.

Right now, both are blocked:

• Developers are bogged down by compliance work.
• Security teams can only issue guidelines, not enforce them.

Agentic Security Infrastructure restores balance:

• Developers move fast again, and CISOs finally have runtime visibility and control.
• No more reinventing security inside every app.
• No more asking developers to do what governance systems should do.

The Path Forward

We started by talking about personalization — how AI learns your preferences and adapts to you. It’s time security did the same. Personalized protection, powered by policy infrastructure, is how we keep agentic AI both safe and scalable.

If agentic AI is the next industrial revolution, then Agentic Security will be its power grid — unseen, essential, and universal.

The companies that build on this foundation will scale faster, comply easier, and earn trust sooner. The ones that don’t will find themselves rewriting the same guardrails over and over again.

The choice is simple: Keep treating security as a feature, or start building it as infrastructure.

In the End

Progress in AI isn’t just about better models — it’s about better boundaries that make those models trustworthy. Developers should build experiences. Security teams should enforce trust.

------

Reposted from https://medium.com/@jazlin/developers-arent-cisos-and-that-s-why-ai-needs-agentic-security-infrastructure-3bc0b69f1d29

Learn more at https://skyrelis.com/